Key Takeaways

  • Preparation is most important—have plans before incidents occur.
  • Document everything during incident response for forensics.
  • Contain first, then investigate—limit damage quickly.
  • Clear communication channels and escalation paths are critical.
  • Post-incident reviews improve future response.
  • Test your IR plan regularly through tabletop exercises.

1. Incident Response Overview

Incident response (IR) is the organized approach to addressing and managing security incidents. A well-prepared IR capability minimizes damage, reduces recovery time and costs, and provides evidence for legal proceedings if necessary.

The NIST Incident Response Framework defines four phases: Preparation, Detection & Analysis, Containment/Eradication/Recovery, and Post-Incident Activity. Each phase builds on the previous and informs improvements for future incidents.

What is a Security Incident?

A security incident is any event that potentially threatens the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information or systems. This includes malware infections, unauthorized access, data breaches, denial of service attacks, and insider threats.

2. Preparation Phase

2.1 IR Team and Roles

RoleResponsibility
IR LeadCoordinates response, makes decisions
Technical LeadOversees technical analysis and containment
Forensics AnalystPreserves evidence, conducts analysis
CommunicationsInternal/external communications
Legal CounselCompliance, legal implications
Executive SponsorAuthority for major decisions

2.2 IR Plan Components

2.3 Tools and Resources

# Essential IR Tools
- SIEM access and queries
- EDR/XDR console
- Forensic workstations
- Network capture tools (Wireshark)
- Log aggregation
- Documentation platform
- Secure communication channel

3. Detection & Analysis

3.1 Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)

3.2 Initial Triage

# Key questions for initial triage:
1. What systems are affected?
2. What type of incident is this?
3. When did it start? Is it ongoing?
4. What is the potential impact?
5. Is sensitive data at risk?
6. How was the attack detected?

# Severity classification
P1/Critical: Active breach, data exfiltration ongoing
P2/High: Confirmed compromise, no active exfil
P3/Medium: Suspicious activity, unconfirmed
P4/Low: Policy violation, minor security issue

4. Containment

4.1 Short-Term Containment

Immediate actions to stop the spread and limit damage:

4.2 Long-Term Containment

# Long-term containment actions:
- Apply emergency patches
- Rotate compromised credentials
- Implement additional monitoring
- Deploy blocks across environment
- Set up honeypots/canaries to detect persistence

# Evidence preservation (before containment if possible):
- Memory dump
- Running processes
- Network connections
- Timestamp of actions
Evidence Preservation

Containment actions can destroy evidence. If possible, capture volatile data (memory, network connections) before isolating systems. Power off versus isolation has forensic implications—discuss with legal and forensics teams.

5. Eradication & Recovery

5.1 Eradication

5.2 Recovery

  1. Restore systems from clean backups
  2. Rebuild compromised systems (don't trust cleaning)
  3. Implement hardening measures
  4. Restore in stages with validation
  5. Enhanced monitoring during recovery period

6. Post-Incident Analysis

6.1 Lessons Learned

# Post-incident review agenda:
1. Timeline of events
2. What worked well?
3. What could be improved?
4. Root cause analysis
5. Recommendations
6. Action items with owners and deadlines

6.2 Documentation

7. Communication & Legal

7.1 Internal Communication

7.2 External Communication

Practice Makes Perfect

Conduct tabletop exercises and simulations regularly. Walk through scenarios with the IR team and stakeholders. This identifies gaps in plans and builds muscle memory for real incidents.

8. Frequently Asked Questions

Should we turn off compromised systems immediately?
It depends. Shutting down preserves disk evidence but loses volatile memory data. For ongoing attacks, isolation may be better than shutdown. Consult with forensics and legal—the right answer depends on the specific situation and priorities.
When should we involve law enforcement?
Consider law enforcement for serious crimes (nation-state attacks, significant fraud, ransomware). They can provide resources and intelligence. However, understand that it may affect your control over timing and disclosure. Consult legal counsel early.

Conclusion

Effective incident response requires preparation before incidents occur. Build your team, develop playbooks, and practice regularly. During incidents, prioritize containment, preserve evidence, and maintain clear communication. Post-incident, learn and improve for next time—because there will be a next time.

Continue Learning:
SIEM Guide Digital Forensics